• View detailsArticle

    Damon Rowe was quoted in an article in the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists on April 3, 2024...

  • View detailsPresentation

    Texas Bank and Trust - Longview, TX...

  • View detailsConference

    2023 Meadows Collier Annual VIRTUAL Tax Conference...

  • View detailsFirm News

    Meadows Collier Congratulates 14 Firm Lawyers on being named D Magazine's 2024 Best Lawyers...

VIEW MOST RECENT
 
 
 
 
 
 
View All
     
Showing 3 of 10

Meadows, Collier, Reed, Cousins, Crouch & Ungerman, L.L.P.

901 Main Street, Suite 3700
Dallas, TX 75202

Phone: (214) 744-3700
Fax: (214) 747-3732
Toll Free: (800) 451-0093

submit inquiry
blog

Payroll Taxes, Worker Misclassification and Options for Resolving IRS Audits

By Joel N. Crouch on January 23, 2017

Employment taxes and worker misclassification continue to be priorities for the IRS and the Tax Division of the Department of Justice. The IRS has announced information sharing agreements with the Department of Labor and state agencies to find businesses that are misclassifying their workers as independent contractors. The DOJ has made employment taxes and worker misclassification priorities for its civil tax and criminal tax sections. It is very important for any business that uses independent contractors to be aware of its options in an IRS employment tax/worker misclassification audit.

The IRS test for determining a worker’s classification is based on control and independence and can be complex and confusing for a business owner. There is no bright line test, but instead it is factual specific and highly subjective. Facts that provide evidence of the degree of control and independence fall into three categories:

      1.  Behavioral: Does the business control or have the right to control what the worker does
           and how the worker does his or her job?

      2.  Financial: Are the business aspects of the worker’s job controlled by the business?
           (These include things like how worker is paid, whether expenses are reimbursed, who
           provides tools/supplies, etc.)

      3.  Type of Relationship: Are there written contracts or employee-type benefits (i.e. pension
           plan, insurance, vacation pay, etc.)? Will the relationship continue and is the work
           performed a key aspect of the business?

No particular fact is controlling and it is not unusual for a taxpayer and IRS to agree on the facts but disagree about the interpretation of the facts.

If a business does not qualify for one of the relief provisions or settlement programs discussed below, a determination that the business has improperly treated one or more of its workers as independent contractors can be very expensive. A determination can result in the business owing federal employment taxes of up to 40% of the amounts paid to the misclassified workers each year, plus penalties and interest. Due to information sharing agreements, the business may also face audits or investigations from the Department of Labor or state agencies.

Luckily, there are a number of IRS provisions and settlement programs that provide relief from an employment tax/worker classification audit for a business that qualifies.

 1.  Section 530 Safe Harbor. Section 530 allows a business to avoid all liability for
      misclassified workers if it meets three criteria.

       a.  The business must have filed all required Forms 1099 for the independent contractors.
            The filing of Forms 1099 is important not only for Section 530 relief but for some of the
            alternatives discussed below.
       b.  Each group of workers that holds similar positions must be treated consistently. For
            example, the business cannot treat any worker doing similar work as a W-2 employee.
       c.  The business must have a reasonable basis for treating the workers as independent
            contractors. Reasonable basis includes:
                  i.     Reliance on court cases, published rulings or a ruling the taxpayer received
                         from the IRS;
                  ii.    A past IRS audit in which there was no assessment with respect to the class of
                         workers at issue;
                 iii.    Establishing that a significant segment of the industry treats similar workers as
                         independent contractors; or
                 iv.    Any other reasonable basis, such as reliance on the advice of a business lawyer
                        or accountant who knew the facts about the business.

 2.  Section 3509 Relief. In order to take advantage of Section 3509 relief, a business
      generally must have filed all required Forms 1099 or have a reasonable basis for failing to
      do so. Section 3509 relief limits a business’ liability as follows:

          a.  Withholding liability is 1.5% of the total wages paid to the worker;
          b.  20% of the employee’s portion of FICA tax; and
          c.  100% of the employer’s portion of FICA taxes.

        If the business cannot establish reasonable cause for failure to file the required Forms
        1099, but it did not intentionally disregard the law in treating a worker as an independent
        contractor, the withholding rate is raised to 3% and the FICA tax rate for the employee’s
        portion is raised to 40%. If the business intentionally failed to file Forms 1099, Section
        3509 relief is not available.

   3.  Classification Settlement Program. The Classification Settlement Program (CSP)
        provides two settlement options for a business in an IRS employment tax audit, if the
        business agrees to classify its workers as employees prospectively. If a business has filed
        all required Forms 1099 and has a colorable claim to Section 530 relief, the CSP offer is
        25% of the employment tax liability for such workers for the most recent year under audit,
        computed using the reduced rates of Section 3509 discussed above. Colorable claim is
        defined as a claim strong enough to have a reasonable chance of being valid if the legal
        basis is generally correct and the facts can be proven in court.

        If the business has filed all the required Forms 1099 but does not have a colorable claim to
        Section 530 relief, the CSP offer is a full employment tax assessment under the reduced
        Section 3509 rates. For a business with multiple tax years under examination or pending, a
        CSP settlement can provide significant relief.

    4.  Voluntary Classification Settlement Program. The Voluntary Classification Settlement
         Program (VCSP) provides a resolution option for a business that is currently not in an IRS
         employment tax audit, but with concerns about potential liability. In the VCSP, the business
         and IRS agree to prospectively treat the class or classes of workers as employees for
         future tax periods. In return, the business will:

             a.  Pay 10% of the employment tax liability that would have been due on compensa-
                  tion paid to the workers for the most recent tax year, determined under the
                  reduced rates of Section 3509;
            b.   Not be liable for any interest and penalties on the amount; and
            c.   Not be subject to an employment tax audit with respect to the worker classification of
                  the workers being reclassified under the VCSP for prior years.

          To be eligible for a VCSP settlement the business must have consistently treated the
          workers to be reclassified as independent contractors or other nonemployees, including
          having filed all required Forms 1099 for the previous 3 years. In addition, the business
          cannot currently be under an IRS employment tax audit or under audit concerning
          the classification of the workers by the Department of Labor or by a state govern-
          ment agency.  If the IRS or the Department of Labor has previously audited the
          business concerning the classification of the workers, the taxpayer will be eligible
          only if the taxpayer has complied with the results of that audit and is not
          currently contesting the classification in court.

For any questions on this or any other tax-related matter, please feel free to contact me at (214) 749-2456 or jcrouch@meadowscollier.com.

Watch Video